Employee Non-Solicitation Agreement Template
Updated on October 11, 2026
Employee Non-Solicitation Agreement is not just a formatted HR document. It records a decision, a rule or a request that can affect pay, discipline, privacy, protected activity, accommodations, taxes or future employment. That is why this US master starts from the legal and operational risk, not from a generic form layout.
The Jotform source gives a useful demand signal, but it is thin and product-led. Its page has little real heading structure, no HowTo markup, no updated date, and the document either omits the legal control points or buries them in generic language. This version rebuilds the page around the points a manager, employee, HR lead or adviser actually has to check before using the document.
The Jotform non-solicitation agreement has typos, a sweeping client definition and a geographic clause that says it is enforceable wherever the employer operates. This master narrows the restriction to legitimate relationship protection and forces state-law review.
Tap any highlighted blank in the document below and type straight into it.Free — no sign-up, no watermark
Employee Non-Solicitation Agreement
- Employer:
- Employee:
- Contact:
- Effective date:
- State law / work location:
1. Purpose
2. Terms and factual record
3. Employee or client response
4. Follow-up and review
5. No waiver of statutory rights
Nothing in this document waives wages, benefits, leave rights, protected activity rights, anti-retaliation protections, accommodation rights, or any other non-waivable right under federal, state or local law.
6. Confidentiality and storage
The completed document will be stored only in the file where it belongs, with access limited to people who need it for HR, payroll, legal, safety, client-service or management purposes. Medical information, if any, must be stored separately and confidentially.
Employer
Date signed:
Employee
Date signed:
What this template is for
Use it when an employee has material customer, client, referral-source or workforce relationships and the employer wants a narrowly drafted post-employment non-solicit. It is not a non-compete.
Use this document when the organisation needs a signed, dated record that can be read later without guessing what happened. The template separates facts from conclusions, gives the employee or client a response path where the document affects them, and keeps the record narrow enough that it does not collect sensitive information simply because a blank form had room for it.
The document is drafted for ordinary US private-sector use. It does not claim to replace a collective bargaining agreement, state-mandated notice, medical certification form, public-sector procedure or regulator-prescribed form. Where those sources apply, this template should sit behind them as a clear internal record rather than contradict them.
What the Jotform source gets wrong
The source restricts customers whose identity the employee learned, not just relationships the employee actually influenced. It also claims indirect damages and broad geography without explaining state-law limits.
A second problem is legal silence. The source document treats the template as a PDF artefact rather than a controlled HR instrument. It rarely says who may approve the document, how long it stays in the personnel file, what information should be excluded, or what happens when federal law, state law, a policy, a handbook or a collective agreement gives the employee a stronger right.
The third problem is evidence quality. A future reader should be able to tell what was requested, approved, denied, paid, deducted, reported, promised or acknowledged. A vague document may look tidy on signing day but it fails precisely when the employer needs it: during a complaint, audit, wage dispute, unemployment claim, discrimination charge, client dispute or handover to a new manager.
How this version is structured
This version separates customer non-solicit, employee non-solicit, restricted relationships, duration, territory, exceptions, lawful competition and remedies.
The document avoids numbered self-references because the template engine can include or hide optional blocks. Instead, cross-references are by clause name. That prevents the classic generated-document defect where a paragraph says to see a fixed clause number that later shifts when an optional section is toggled off.
The page content is written to explain the document, not to sell a PDF editor. The guide describes the clause purpose, the compliance checks, the drafting choices, and the common misuse cases so that the fillable form is supported by substantive search content.
US legal and compliance points
Restrictive covenants are state-law heavy. The FTC noncompete rule is currently stopped by a district-court order, so the agreement must not imply a universal federal ban or universal enforceability. State rules control many non-solicits.
State law still matters. Federal sources set a floor for many of the issues in this batch, but states frequently add wage-deduction, final-pay, sick-leave, non-solicitation, privacy, hair-discrimination, personnel-record and scheduling rules. The US master flags the federal issue and leaves a state-law field so B3-style region variants can tighten the page later if a state-specific source is added.
The template also avoids overclaiming. It does not say the document is attorney-approved, compliant in every state, or enough by itself. It is a strong starting point that makes the missing questions visible before the document is signed.
Recordkeeping and privacy
The document should not list confidential customer details unless needed. Define restricted customers by relationship and time period, and store customer lists securely.
Keep the completed document only where it belongs. A disciplinary form may belong in a personnel file; a medical restriction may need separate confidential storage; a marketing proposal belongs in the client file; a resignation letter belongs with payroll and offboarding records. Mixing those files creates access and retention problems.
Limit free-text fields. They are useful for facts but risky for speculation, diagnoses, protected characteristics, unsupported opinions or settlement language. The template labels the narrative fields so managers know whether to write facts, requested terms, approval conditions or next actions.
When not to use it
Do not use it for low-wage employees, states that prohibit the restriction, ordinary competition, public customer information, or as a disguised non-compete.
Do not use the template to waive rights, punish protected activity, collect unnecessary medical information, avoid wage payment, or create a restrictive covenant that state law does not allow. Do not use it where a statute, agency, court, union agreement or insurance carrier requires its own form.
If the facts are disputed, high-value, safety-critical, medical, union-related, immigration-related, involving a minor, involving harassment or discrimination, or likely to lead to litigation, the template should be reviewed before it is sent or signed.
Clause-by-clause guide
- Legitimate business interest
- Identifies the customer, employee or goodwill interest being protected.
- Restricted customers
- Limits coverage to customers the employee materially dealt with or learned confidential information about during a defined lookback period.
- Restricted employees
- Limits employee non-solicit to targeted recruiting rather than ordinary references or general advertisements.
- Duration
- Sets a period that can be assessed under state law.
- Geography or account scope
- Uses account scope where geography is not meaningful.
- Permitted activity
- Preserves lawful competition, general skills and responses to unsolicited customer contact where appropriate.
- State-law condition
- Makes enforcement subject to the law of the employee work state.
- Remedies
- Allows appropriate remedies without overclaiming automatic entitlement.
US compliance checklist
Non-solicitation enforceability varies sharply by state and worker type.
Do not treat it as a non-compete
The FTC noncompete rule page records that a district court stopped the FTC from enforcing the rule. State law remains central, and non-solicits need their own analysis.
FTC - Noncompete Rule status pageLimit customers by relationship
A restriction covering every customer whose name the employee learned is more vulnerable than one tied to material contact, goodwill or confidential information.
Check worker and compensation thresholds
Several states restrict covenants for low-wage workers or require notice before employment starts. Check the state where the employee works.
Avoid employee mobility overreach
The agreement should not prevent ordinary job changes, general advertisements, public information or use of general skills.
Separate confidentiality from solicitation
Use the NDA to protect information and this agreement to protect relationships. Do not blur the two.
Review before enforcement
Sending a demand letter under an invalid covenant can create counterclaims or statutory penalties in some states.
How to complete this template
- Confirm the right document. Check that this template matches the decision or record you need. If a regulator, state agency, collective agreement, insurer or court requires a prescribed form, use that required form first and keep this document as supporting detail only.
- Fill in only necessary facts. Complete the factual fields with dates, names, roles, requested terms, approvals and next steps. Do not add speculation, diagnoses, protected characteristics or informal comments that do not belong in the record.
- Check federal and state limits. Read the compliance checklist and confirm the applicable state rule before you rely on a wage deduction, final-pay condition, restrictive covenant, medical inquiry, scheduling decision, policy acknowledgement or discipline record.
- Give the affected person a response route. Where the document affects an employee or client, give them a chance to respond, ask questions, request accommodation, or correct factual errors. Record whether the signature is acknowledgement only or agreement to terms.
- Store and review the document. Put the completed document in the right file, restrict access, set a review date where the document is a policy or ongoing arrangement, and replace it if the facts or law change.
Frequently asked questions
Is a non-solicitation agreement the same as a non-compete?
No. A non-compete restricts working for or starting a competing business. A non-solicit targets active solicitation of customers or employees. Some states still scrutinize non-solicits closely.
How long should the restriction last?
There is no universal answer. The period must be reasonable under the applicable state law and tied to the relationship being protected. Shorter, better-targeted restrictions are easier to defend.
Can it cover every customer of the company?
Usually that is overbroad. A stronger clause covers customers the employee had material contact with or about whom they learned confidential information during a defined lookback period.
Can former employees respond if a customer contacts them first?
That depends on drafting and state law. The template includes a permitted-activity section so the parties decide how unsolicited contact is treated.
Does California allow employee non-solicits?
California is highly restrictive toward employee mobility covenants, and California-specific advice is needed. Do not use a generic US covenant there without review.
Can we enforce it with an injunction?
Possibly, but only if the covenant is valid and the facts support equitable relief. The agreement should not promise automatic injunctions in every case.
Related templates
Disclaimer
This template and guide are general information, not legal, tax, employment, payroll, privacy, marketing or HR advice. No attorney has reviewed your facts, no regulator has approved this document, and no professional relationship is created by using it. Federal, state and local rules differ and change; check the law where the employee works and get professional advice before you sign, send, file or rely on this document.


