What happens if I accidentally submit duplicate income?

Can I claim expenses for business-related accessibility tools or software?

Accessibility tools and software can be essential for running a business effectively. For some people, they are the difference between being able to work at all and being shut out of day-to-day tasks. For others, they make work faster, safer, more accurate, and less exhausting. If you’re self-employed, a director of a limited company, a contractor, or you run a small business, it’s natural to ask: can you claim the cost of business-related accessibility tools or software as an expense?

The practical answer is often “yes, potentially,” but it depends on several factors: how your business is structured, whether the expense is incurred “wholly and exclusively” for business purposes, how the item is used in real life, and whether the purchase looks more like a personal cost than a business cost. Accessibility tools sometimes sit right at that boundary because they can be deeply personal, used across work and home life, and connected to health or disability needs. That does not automatically disqualify them. It just means you should be thoughtful about what you buy, how you use it, and how you document it.

This article explains how business expense rules typically apply to accessibility tools and software, what kinds of items often qualify, what common pitfalls to avoid, how to handle mixed business and personal use, and how to make your recordkeeping strong enough that your position is understandable and defensible.

What counts as an accessibility tool or accessibility software?

“Accessibility tools” covers a wide range of products and services. Some are built into operating systems and devices; others are specialised add-ons or subscriptions. They can be physical equipment, digital products, or professional services. Here are common categories that businesses and individuals often consider:

Screen readers, magnifiers, and text-to-speech software help people who are blind, have low vision, or experience visual fatigue. Speech-to-text tools, dictation software, and voice control can support people with mobility impairments, repetitive strain issues, chronic pain, neurodivergence, or fatigue. Captioning and transcription tools can support deaf or hard-of-hearing users, people with auditory processing needs, or professionals who work heavily with audio and video. Assistive writing tools can help with dyslexia or other language processing needs. Alternative input devices—ergonomic keyboards, one-handed keyboards, trackballs, vertical mice, switch devices, and eye-tracking hardware—can reduce strain or enable access where standard devices do not work well.

Even general productivity software can function as an accessibility aid when it reduces barriers, such as note-taking tools that allow audio syncing, task managers that support executive function, or reading tools that reformat text for easier comprehension. The key is not the marketing label on the product, but the purpose it serves in your working life and whether it is connected to how you carry on your business.

How business expense rules usually work in plain English

Most tax systems use a core idea: to be deductible, a cost must be incurred for business purposes. The phrase used may differ by country, but the theme is consistent. An expense is generally claimable when it is a genuine cost of earning your business income, and it is not mainly personal in nature.

That sounds straightforward until you encounter items that sit across both domains. Accessibility tools are sometimes used for work and for personal life; sometimes they primarily benefit the person rather than the business; sometimes they are essential to enable work but are also helpful at home. These complexities do not automatically prevent a claim. Instead, you typically need to consider one or more of the following:

First, what is the primary reason for the purchase? If the main motivation is to do your work tasks, that supports deductibility. Second, how is the item actually used? If it is used mostly for business, you may be able to claim all or a proportion. Third, is the item capital or revenue? Software subscriptions are often “running costs,” while equipment may be a longer-term asset that may be treated differently. Fourth, is the expense inherently personal? If it is similar to everyday personal living costs (like ordinary clothing, typical consumer electronics used broadly for home life, or medical costs), it may be harder to claim unless there is a clear business use and the rules allow it.

Because accessibility tools can be connected to disability or health, people sometimes assume they must be treated like medical expenses. But in many cases, the business angle is stronger: the purchase is made so you can perform your work role, deliver services, meet client needs, and operate efficiently. Framing and evidence matter.

When accessibility software is more likely to be a deductible business expense

Accessibility software is often easier to justify than physical items because it is clearly part of your work toolkit and often sits on your work device. Here are situations where claims are commonly more defensible:

If you buy dictation software because you write reports, proposals, code documentation, legal drafts, or marketing content as part of your business, and typing is not feasible or causes significant pain or fatigue, the connection to business tasks is direct. If you purchase captioning or transcription software because you edit videos for clients, host webinars, conduct interviews, or need accurate meeting notes for your professional work, the business link is also strong. If you purchase a screen reader because you must navigate business systems, emails, accounting tools, or client platforms, that is clearly a work-enabling expense.

Where things can get trickier is when the software is installed on a personal device used for everything, or when the software is used heavily outside work. Even then, you may be able to claim an appropriate portion if you can reasonably separate business from personal use, but the cleaner the separation, the better.

When accessibility hardware is more likely to be deductible

Hardware can be claimable too, but it sometimes raises more questions because it can resemble consumer electronics or personal equipment. The strongest cases tend to be where the hardware is specific to work tasks or is used primarily in a work setting.

An ergonomic keyboard, trackball, or vertical mouse used at your primary work desk and purchased to reduce pain, strain, or risk of injury can be a reasonable business expense when your work involves heavy computer use. A dedicated headset with noise cancellation used for client calls, concentration, or audio clarity can be justifiable if communication and focus are core to your work. An external monitor or monitor arm might be considered accessibility-related if it supports low vision needs or postural requirements, but it can also be a standard business asset. The claim usually rests on whether it is a genuine work tool and how much it is used for business.

More specialised hardware—braille displays, alternative input switches, eye-tracking systems, or adaptive controllers—often has an even clearer accessibility purpose. The issue becomes less “is it personal?” and more “is it used for business?” If it is, and it enables you to perform your role, it is often easier to argue that it is part of your business equipment.

Wholly business use vs mixed use: how apportionment usually works

A common challenge is mixed use: you use the same software or device for both business and personal activities. Many tax systems allow you to claim the business portion of an expense while excluding the personal portion. This is called apportionment.

Apportionment is not a loophole; it is a practical recognition that modern work often happens on shared devices, especially for sole traders and freelancers. But apportionment needs to be reasonable. If you claim 90% business use for a laptop that is clearly used for streaming and gaming nightly, that may not look credible. If you claim 50% business use for a software subscription that you use for client work and personal projects, you should have a way to justify that split, such as time logs, usage reports, or a consistent method applied across similar expenses.

For accessibility tools, apportionment can be sensitive because you may need the tool in both work and personal contexts, and separating use may feel artificial. Still, from a tax perspective, the business claim is about business activity. If you can keep the tool dedicated to work, do it. If you can’t, document a sensible split. Even a short written note prepared at the time—explaining why you purchased the item, how it supports specific work tasks, and an estimate of business versus personal use—can be helpful.

Company vs self-employment: why your business structure matters

Whether you can “claim” the expense and how you do it can differ depending on whether you are a sole trader (or equivalent), a partnership, or operating through a limited company. The underlying concept is similar, but the mechanics differ.

If you are self-employed, you typically claim allowable business expenses against your business income. If the accessibility tool is used for your business and the expense meets your jurisdiction’s rules, you include it as a deductible cost. If it is an asset, you may need to treat it as capital equipment rather than an immediate expense.

If you operate through a limited company, the company can usually pay for tools needed for work, but you must be careful about personal benefit. When a company pays for something that is partly personal, it may create a taxable benefit or require additional reporting. Some accessibility-related items may be provided as workplace equipment and remain non-taxable if they are genuinely for work and meet the relevant conditions. Other items may trigger personal benefit rules if they are available for private use or have a dual purpose that cannot be separated.

In practice, the structure question is not about whether accessibility tools can be supported by your business. It’s about how to do it cleanly: who buys it, who owns it, where it is used, and whether the arrangement creates taxable personal benefits. If you are unsure, it is often worth getting advice from a qualified accountant familiar with your local rules, especially if the purchase is expensive.

Software subscriptions, licences, and upgrades

Many accessibility solutions are subscription-based: monthly dictation tools, captioning services, transcription minutes, premium screen readers, or accessibility plug-ins. Subscriptions are often treated as running costs because you pay regularly to access the service. That usually makes the accounting simpler than a one-off hardware purchase.

However, you should still consider whether the subscription is tied to your business activity. If you subscribe to an AI transcription service specifically to produce client deliverables, meeting minutes, or research notes, the business use is clear. If you subscribe to a tool mainly for personal journaling or home use, it will be harder to justify. If you use it for both, apportionment may apply.

Licence upgrades can also be relevant. If a new version adds features that reduce barriers and directly support your business—improved accuracy, better language support, integration with your work platforms, enhanced accessibility options—then the upgrade cost is often just another business tool expense. Keep records that show what you purchased and why, especially if it looks like a discretionary upgrade.

Examples of claimable scenarios

Concrete examples can help clarify what typically looks business-related. Imagine a freelance editor with repetitive strain issues who buys dictation software and an ergonomic keyboard to continue producing client work without aggravating pain. Those items are directly tied to earning income. Or a consultant with hearing loss who purchases a real-time captioning subscription and a high-quality microphone to ensure accurate communication with clients in remote meetings. Again, the link is clear: client delivery and communication.

Consider a developer with low vision who purchases a screen reader, a large monitor, and specialist magnification software to work with code and documentation. Or a video producer who pays for captioning tools because captions are part of the service package delivered to clients and also improve quality and compliance for client channels. These examples demonstrate a direct line from the expense to the work product.

In each case, the expense is not a vague “well-being” purchase; it is a practical tool that supports business output. That framing matters. If you can describe the purchase in terms of the work it enables—writing, editing, coding, meeting facilitation, client deliverables—your claim becomes more understandable.

Examples where you should be cautious

Some purchases are riskier. For example, if you buy a high-end consumer tablet marketed as an accessibility-friendly device but you mainly use it for entertainment and personal browsing, the business claim may be weak. If you buy a general-purpose smartwatch and say it helps with reminders and focus, that may be true, but it may also look like a personal lifestyle device unless your business use is clear and well documented.

Another grey area is when an item is fundamentally personal or medical in nature, even if it indirectly helps you work. Costs that look like personal health expenses can be harder to treat as business deductions unless the rules explicitly allow it or the item is clearly workplace equipment. For example, some types of therapy, general medical treatment, or personal care aids may be seen as private expenses. That doesn’t mean you can never claim anything related to health or disability, but it does mean you should be careful to distinguish between “this helps my life generally” and “this is a tool used to do my work.”

Similarly, home modifications or general household items are often challenging. A special chair might be justifiable for work if it is a dedicated office chair used for business tasks, but a claim for a sofa that “reduces pain while reading emails” is unlikely to be persuasive. The more your purchase resembles ordinary personal spending, the more you need clear, specific justification and, where appropriate, apportionment.

Capital vs day-to-day expenses: why it matters

Tax rules often separate day-to-day running costs from capital assets. Running costs are things you consume in the course of business: subscriptions, small consumables, routine services. Capital assets are items with lasting value used over time: computers, equipment, some one-off licences, furniture, and specialised hardware.

If your accessibility tool is an asset, you may not always deduct the full cost immediately. Instead, you may claim it through capital allowances, depreciation, or a similar mechanism depending on your country’s rules and your business structure. This is not a reason to avoid the purchase; it just affects timing and how you record it. Many small businesses still get relief in the year of purchase through specific schemes, but the exact approach is jurisdiction-specific.

Even if you cannot deduct the full cost in one go, the purchase can still be a legitimate business cost. The key is to classify it correctly in your bookkeeping and keep the supporting documents.

Recordkeeping: how to make your claim easier to support

Good recordkeeping is the simplest way to reduce stress and uncertainty. For accessibility tools and software, it helps to keep both the normal financial records and a brief “business purpose” note.

Start with the basics: keep the invoice or receipt, proof of payment, and any licence keys or subscription confirmations. Make sure the document shows the supplier, date, item description, and amount. If you run a company, ensure the invoice is in the company name where appropriate.

Then add context. Write a short note (even a few sentences) that answers: what did you buy, what work task does it support, and where is it used? For example: “Purchased dictation software to produce client reports and reduce strain from typing; used on work laptop for drafting proposals and reports.” Or: “Captioning subscription used for client meetings and webinar delivery; transcripts kept as project records.”

If there is mixed use, note your apportionment method. You might write: “Used about 70% for client projects and 30% personal; apportionment based on weekly time tracking over a month.” You don’t need to turn your life into a forensic audit, but you do want a reasonable explanation that you can consistently apply.

What about accessibility tools that also benefit clients or customers?

Sometimes you purchase accessibility software not primarily for yourself, but to make your business more accessible to others. For example, you might buy captioning tools for videos to make your marketing content accessible, or you might license an accessibility auditing tool to improve client websites. You might purchase software that helps you generate accessible PDFs, test colour contrast, or evaluate screen reader compatibility.

These costs are often even easier to view as business expenses because they directly relate to the products and services you provide, compliance needs, or customer experience. If the tool is part of your process and helps you deliver better outcomes, it generally looks like an ordinary business cost—similar to any other professional software licence.

Even when the tool also helps you personally, the client-facing nature can strengthen the claim. Again, keep records that show how you use the tool in projects and deliverables.

Reasonable adjustments, workplace support, and alternative funding routes

Depending on where you live, there may be other ways to support accessibility costs besides claiming them as business expenses. Some countries have grants or schemes that help fund workplace adjustments, assistive technology, or specialist equipment. Employers may have obligations to make reasonable adjustments. Self-employed individuals may have access to specific support programmes. Insurance policies may sometimes cover certain workplace-related needs.

These options do not replace tax deductibility, but they can complement it. For example, if you receive a grant that covers part of a purchase, you may need to consider how that affects what you can claim as an expense. The interaction between funding and tax treatment can be nuanced, so if you are dealing with grants or reimbursements, it’s sensible to keep careful documentation and, if needed, consult a professional.

How to describe accessibility expenses in your accounts

The way you label an expense in your bookkeeping can influence how clear it is to you later and how easy it is to explain. You don’t have to use special language, but you do want descriptions that reflect business use.

For example, “Speech-to-text subscription for client documentation” is more informative than “Software.” “Ergonomic keyboard for workstation” is clearer than “Keyboard.” For web-based tools, noting the service name and purpose helps: “Captioning and transcription service for webinars and client calls.” For hardware, you might include the primary location: “Work office monitor arm for ergonomic setup.”

Clarity is especially useful if you ever change accountants, face a query, or need to justify your costs months later. Accessibility tools are legitimate business tools, but they can be misunderstood if your records are vague.

What if I buy something because I need it to work at all?

This is a common question, and it gets to the heart of accessibility. If you buy a tool because you personally need it in order to work, it can feel odd that it might be treated as partly “personal.” From a human perspective, the tool is a bridge to equal participation. From a tax perspective, the question is often narrower: is the cost a business expense or a private expense?

In many cases, if the tool is used for business activity and you can show the connection to your work tasks, it is reasonable to treat it as a business cost, at least in proportion to business use. The fact that you “need it to work” can support the argument that it is incurred to earn income. Where difficulties arise is when the item is indistinguishable from personal living costs or when it is used broadly in daily life in a way that cannot be separated from business use.

Practical steps can help. Use a dedicated work device where possible. Keep the tool primarily within your work environment. Avoid buying features you don’t need for business. Document your rationale and usage. These steps don’t change your needs; they simply make the business link easier to see.

Remote work, home offices, and accessibility equipment

Remote work can blur lines even further. If your home is your primary workplace, then many accessibility-related items will naturally be located there. A home office setup can legitimately include accessibility equipment, just like it can include a desk, chair, monitor, and internet costs. The key remains business use.

If you have a dedicated workspace and equipment that is primarily used for business, your claim tends to be stronger. If the equipment moves around the home and is used for general family activities, you may need to apportion. It can also help to keep a clear boundary: a separate user profile on your computer for work, separate accounts for work subscriptions, or separate devices for work and personal use if practical.

Remember that “home” does not automatically mean “personal.” Many businesses operate from home, and accessibility equipment can be part of making that workplace usable. The challenge is documenting that your purchase supports business activity, not simply household life.

Accessibility tools and professionalism: quality, safety, and client expectations

Accessibility-related purchases are not only about personal comfort; they can also affect professionalism and client outcomes. A better microphone can make your voice clearer. A captioning tool can ensure participants can follow a webinar. A dictation tool can speed up turnaround times for deliverables. A screen reader can help you navigate client systems efficiently. These are business benefits, and it’s worth acknowledging them in your records.

When you can articulate business benefits beyond “I like it,” your claim becomes more robust. For example: “Improves accuracy of meeting notes,” “reduces turnaround time for deliverables,” “enables reliable client communication,” “reduces risk of repetitive strain, supporting consistent output,” or “ensures accessible deliverables for clients.” These are concrete outcomes that align with how businesses operate.

Practical checklist before you claim an accessibility tool or software expense

Before you put an accessibility expense through your business, run through a quick checklist:

Are you buying it because of a work task or business requirement? Can you name the specific work activities it supports? Will it be used mainly for business? If not, can you reasonably apportion business use? Is it a subscription or a long-term asset, and have you recorded it in the appropriate category? Is the invoice in the right name (you or your company)? Do you have a short note explaining the business rationale? If it might be questioned as personal, have you taken steps to keep the business use clear (dedicated device, dedicated workspace, separate account)?

If you can answer these comfortably, you are in a much better position to claim the cost appropriately. If you cannot, it may still be claimable, but you should be more cautious and consider getting tailored advice.

Common mistakes to avoid

One common mistake is claiming the full cost of an item with obvious mixed use without apportioning or documenting. Another is treating all accessibility-related purchases as automatically business-related without considering how they’re used. A third is vague bookkeeping: recording a purchase with no description so that later it looks like a personal gadget. Another issue is buying a premium consumer item where a modest business-focused tool would do, and then struggling to justify why the business paid for it.

A subtler mistake is failing to consider how company purchases can create personal benefit reporting. If you run a limited company, it’s particularly important to ensure that the company paying for an item is the right approach and that you understand any implications if the item is available for private use.

Finally, don’t ignore the “small stuff.” Accessibility often involves a combination of small tools that add up: plug-ins, specialised apps, replacement parts, adaptive accessories, and minor upgrades. These smaller expenses can be easier to justify as routine business costs, but they still need receipts and clear descriptions.

So, can you claim accessibility tools or software as a business expense?

In many situations, yes: business-related accessibility tools and software can be claimable when they are purchased to support your work and used for business purposes. Subscriptions and specialist software are often straightforward when tied to business tasks. Hardware and equipment can also be claimable, especially when used primarily in your work environment or when it clearly enables you to do your job. If there is mixed personal and business use, apportionment is often the practical route, supported by reasonable documentation.

The most important thing is to treat accessibility tools as what they are: part of your working toolkit. Explain the business purpose, keep records, classify the expense correctly, and be honest about usage. If your situation is complex—high-value purchases, company structure complications, grants, or significant mixed use—getting professional advice can save you trouble and help you claim what you are entitled to without overstepping.

Accessibility is not a luxury. For many people, it is the infrastructure of participation. When the tools you buy are genuinely used to run your business, deliver services, and earn income, it is reasonable to consider them within your business expenses—so long as you approach the claim carefully, proportionately, and with clear evidence.