How do I deal with income earned from affiliate links on my website?

Understanding what you’re really asking

When people ask, “Can I claim expenses for business-related professional photos or headshots?”, they’re usually trying to solve two problems at once: (1) keeping their business accounts clean and defensible, and (2) paying as little tax as legally possible. Professional photography sits in a slightly awkward zone because it can look personal (a picture of you) while being used commercially (your brand, your marketing, your website, your pitch decks, your speaker bio, your staff directory). The key question is not whether the photo is “nice” or “professional,” but whether the cost is genuinely incurred for business purposes and recorded in a way that makes sense within your business’s overall activity.

In practical terms, claiming the expense means treating the photography cost as a business expense in your bookkeeping and then deducting it from your taxable profit (or otherwise reflecting it correctly if you operate through a company). The benefit to you depends on your tax rate and structure. But the decision isn’t just about “can I?” It’s also about “how should I treat it?” and “what evidence should I keep?” because those are the points that matter if you ever need to explain the claim.

What counts as “business-related” professional photos or headshots?

Business-related photography generally means the images are created primarily to help you generate income, win clients, support your brand, or communicate your services. That might include headshots for:

• Your business website “About” page or team page

• LinkedIn and other professional profiles used to attract clients

• Marketing materials such as brochures, flyers, ads, and social graphics

• Press kits, speaker profiles, event listings, and conference programs

• Pitch decks, proposals, and tender submissions

• Author bios, podcast guest pages, and media appearances

Similarly, professional photos may include brand photography (you at work, your studio, your workshop), product shots, service process images, and team photos. The closer the photos are tied to promoting and delivering your business, the easier it is to justify the claim.

Where it becomes tricky is when the photos have a substantial personal purpose as well. A headshot can look like a personal keepsake even if you use it for business. The more “personal” the context (for example, glam shots, lifestyle portraits with family, or images clearly intended for personal social media rather than business marketing), the harder it is to argue that the primary purpose is business.

The general tax principle: “wholly and exclusively” (and its close cousins)

Although rules differ by country, most tax systems share a similar idea: a business expense should be deductible only if it is incurred for business purposes, rather than personal purposes. Some places phrase this as “ordinary and necessary,” others as “wholly and exclusively,” and many apply a similar test in practice. Professional headshots often pass the test when they are purchased specifically to support business activities.

In real life, tax authorities don’t require that a cost be “fun” or “unfun.” They care about intent and use. If you commission images to represent your business professionally and to help market your services, that is usually a strong business intent. If you commission images mainly because you want updated portraits for personal reasons and you happen to also upload one to LinkedIn, that’s a weaker business intent. The facts and how you use the photos matter.

Common scenarios and how they’re usually treated

Scenario 1: A sole trader or freelancer buys a headshot for their website and LinkedIn

This is the classic case. You’re a consultant, designer, coach, therapist, tradesperson, or similar. You commission a photographer for headshots and maybe a few “at work” images to use on your website, proposals, and LinkedIn. In most cases, this is strongly arguable as a marketing expense because it supports client acquisition and business credibility.

What makes the claim stronger: your website actually uses the headshot, your proposals include it, your profile is used to attract business leads, and you keep the invoice and usage details.

Scenario 2: A limited company pays for director headshots for the company website

If you operate through a company, headshots can still be business expenses if they are used for the company’s marketing and communications. However, companies bring an extra layer: the possibility that tax authorities see the cost as providing a personal benefit to an individual (a director or employee). Often, a company can pay for something that benefits the business and an individual at the same time, but the question becomes whether it is primarily for business and whether any personal benefit needs separate reporting.

Where the headshot is clearly for company branding (used on the company site, press materials, staff directories, tender documents), the business purpose is easier to show. Where the headshot is mostly for the director’s personal brand unrelated to the company’s business, the risk increases.

Scenario 3: A professional actor, model, or performer pays for headshots

Headshots for performers are often central to obtaining work. This can be one of the easiest categories to justify because headshots are directly used in auditions, casting profiles, agent submissions, and promotional materials. Even so, you still want to document that the expenditure is work-related, because the images are personal in subject matter.

The more the headshots are tied to casting platforms, agency work, and income generation, the stronger the argument that it’s a deductible professional expense.

Scenario 4: Staff photos for a team page, internal directory, or security passes

Team photography is typically a straightforward business cost, especially when the photos are used for a website, internal communications, or operational needs. If the images support staffing, customer communication, or business operations, they are usually treated as a business expense.

Scenario 5: Photos that are partly business and partly personal

This is where things can get complicated. Suppose you book a photographer for a day and capture both corporate headshots and personal family portraits. Or you get images for your business plus personal lifestyle photos for your social media. In such mixed-use situations, you may need to split the cost between business and personal portions based on a reasonable method.

Whether you’re allowed to apportion depends on local rules and the exact nature of the expense. Some tax systems allow apportionment when a cost has a distinct business component; others are stricter where the personal element is substantial. Regardless, if there is a genuine mix, it’s prudent to either separate the sessions/invoices or have a clear allocation method (for example, separate line items for business headshots versus personal portraits).

Marketing vs. “capital” expenditure: are photos an asset?

Another question that sometimes comes up is whether professional photography should be treated as a “capital” cost rather than a normal day-to-day expense. In simple terms, a capital cost is usually something that creates an enduring asset or benefit over time (like equipment, a building improvement, or purchased intellectual property). An ordinary expense is a recurring operational cost (like advertising, rent, utilities).

Most small-business headshot and brand photography costs are commonly treated as marketing or promotional expenses, especially when they are used for advertising and business development. However, in some cases—particularly if you commission a large suite of images with long-term rights and substantial value—you could be entering territory where accounting treatment gets more nuanced.

That doesn’t automatically mean you can’t claim it; it may simply affect when and how you claim it (immediately or spread over time). The practical approach for many small businesses is to treat ordinary marketing photography as a normal business expense, but be mindful that a very large, long-term, rights-heavy photography project might be treated differently in some jurisdictions and under some accounting frameworks.

What about image licensing, usage rights, and ongoing subscriptions?

Professional photography often includes more than just “a photo shoot.” You may pay for licensing, usage rights, extended rights for advertising, or ongoing access to a photographer’s image library. These extra components are typically easier to frame as business costs because they are directly tied to marketing and commercial use. Typical deductible components often include:

• The photographer’s fee for the session

• Studio hire

• Post-production and retouching services

• Commercial usage licensing fees

• Stock photography subscriptions or one-off stock purchases for business marketing

From a bookkeeping perspective, it’s helpful when invoices clearly list these items. If you’re ever asked what the expense was for, an invoice that spells out “commercial headshots for company website and marketing” is much easier to support than an invoice that simply says “photo session.”

Can you claim related costs like hair, makeup, clothing, or grooming?

This is one of the most common follow-on questions, and it’s where many people get caught out. A photography session might require you to pay for hair styling, makeup, grooming, or wardrobe. The business relevance depends on whether those costs are essentially personal living costs or truly part of a business production.

In many tax systems, personal grooming and clothing are normally treated as personal expenses, even if you believe they help you look professional. For example, ordinary clothing that could be worn outside of work is often seen as a personal expense. The fact you wore it in a headshot does not necessarily make it a business expense.

However, there can be exceptions depending on your profession and local rules. For example, industry-specific costume, protective gear, or clearly specialized wardrobe might be treated differently in some circumstances. Makeup and hair can sometimes be argued as production costs in creative industries (for example, on a commercial shoot with a production budget), but for most typical business headshots, these are often viewed as personal appearance costs.

The safest general approach is: claim the photography and related business production costs that are clearly commercial in nature, and be cautious with items that look like personal grooming or everyday clothing. If you do decide to claim such items, expect that you may need a strong justification and excellent documentation.

What if you use the headshot on personal social media too?

Using the same headshot on personal platforms doesn’t automatically destroy the business claim, but it can affect how defensible the claim is. Many professionals use the same image everywhere because that’s practical. The key is whether the photo was commissioned primarily for business and is used materially in business contexts.

Here are some factors that strengthen the business case even if there is some personal use:

• The photo appears on your business website, business email signature, proposals, or ads

• The photographer invoice describes business usage

• The style and composition are clearly professional and aligned to your brand

• The timing aligns to a business launch, rebrand, new website, or marketing campaign

If, on the other hand, the only “business use” is a one-time LinkedIn upload while the images are otherwise personal lifestyle portraits, the claim becomes weaker.

How to document and support the claim

For any tax-deductible business expense, documentation is your best friend. For professional photos or headshots, aim to keep:

• The invoice/receipt showing the supplier, date, amount, and description

• Evidence of business use (website screenshots, brochure PDFs, campaign drafts, portfolio pages)

• A short note in your bookkeeping record explaining the purpose (for example, “Headshots for website rebrand and proposals”)

• Any licensing terms or usage rights agreement (useful to show commercial intent)

If you’re running a company, it can also help to have internal records showing why the photos were commissioned (for example, a marketing plan, brand refresh plan, or a decision note). This doesn’t need to be elaborate. Even a simple email to yourself or meeting note can help demonstrate the business rationale.

What category should you use in your accounts?

In most bookkeeping systems, professional photos for marketing purposes are typically recorded under marketing, advertising, or promotional expenses. Some businesses use a “Photography” subcategory within marketing. If the photos are specifically for a product catalogue or e-commerce listing, you might also see them recorded under cost of sales or direct selling costs, depending on the business and how it tracks marketing.

What matters most is consistency and clarity. If you treat headshots as marketing one year, don’t suddenly treat them as something else the next year without a reason. Keep it simple, keep it logical, and ensure your supporting documents match the way you’ve recorded the expense.

Does the answer change if you’re self-employed, a partnership, or a limited company?

The underlying logic is similar—business purpose, documentation, and appropriate accounting treatment—but the practical implications can differ.

Self-employed (sole trader)

As a sole trader, you’re effectively claiming expenses against your business income. The main risk areas are mixed-use expenses and anything that looks like personal living costs. If the headshots are clearly used for marketing your business, it is often simpler to justify.

Partnerships

Partnerships often follow similar principles to sole traders, but the business purpose may be tied to the partnership rather than an individual. If a partner’s headshot is used to market the partnership, it may be a partnership expense. If it’s for an individual partner’s unrelated activities, that becomes harder.

Limited company

With a company, you should consider whether the cost is wholly for the company’s business and whether it confers a personal benefit to a director or employee. In many everyday situations, staff headshots used on the company website are treated as normal business marketing costs. But if the company is paying for photos that are not actually used by the company and instead build an individual’s personal brand, you may have a problem.

What about VAT or sales tax on the photography?

Indirect taxes such as VAT or sales tax introduce another layer. Generally, if the photography is used for business purposes and you are registered to reclaim VAT (or an equivalent input tax), you may be able to reclaim the tax portion subject to your local rules. The same business-use principles usually apply: if the purchase is partly personal, you may need to restrict what you reclaim.

Because the mechanics differ significantly by location—especially around mixed-use, exemptions, and partial exemption rules—the safest approach is to treat VAT/sales tax recovery as a separate decision from “is the expense deductible?” You can have situations where something is deductible for income tax but restricted for VAT recovery (or vice versa), depending on the system.

When claiming headshots can raise red flags

Most headshot claims don’t cause trouble, but certain patterns can raise eyebrows:

• The photos are obviously personal portraits with no clear business usage

• The expense is unusually large compared to your business income or typical marketing spend

• The invoice is vague and the supplier description doesn’t indicate business use

• The cost is bundled with personal services (for example, personal styling or luxury experiences)

• You claim extensive grooming, clothing, and personal appearance costs alongside the photography

None of these automatically means you’re doing something wrong, but they make it more important to have clear evidence of business purpose and a reasonable approach to mixed use.

Practical tips to make the claim cleaner and easier

Here are practical steps you can take before you even book the photographer:

• Ask for an invoice description that reflects business purpose (for example, “Business headshots for website and marketing materials”)

• Keep business and personal sessions separate (different dates or at least different line items)

• Store a copy of the licensing terms that show commercial usage rights

• Save examples of where you used the photos (website pages, PDFs, ads)

• Pay from the business account where possible to keep your bookkeeping clean

• Be consistent with how you categorize similar costs each year

These habits do not just help at tax time; they help you understand your marketing spend and measure return on investment. A headshot is not just a tax question—it’s also part of your commercial strategy.

What if the photographer is overseas, or you used an online headshot service?

Many businesses work with photographers in different countries or use online “AI-assisted” headshot services. From an expense perspective, the same principles apply: business purpose and documentation. Keep the invoice, keep proof of business use, and ensure you can explain what you bought.

However, cross-border purchases can add complexity for VAT/sales tax, withholding tax, or reporting obligations depending on the jurisdictions involved. If the amount is material or you make frequent overseas purchases, it may be worth checking how your local rules treat imported services.

How long can you keep using the photos and still justify the original claim?

It’s common to use headshots for years. That doesn’t generally make the original expense “less business-related.” If anything, long-term use can support the argument that the images were commissioned for business branding. But if your photo session was years ago and you never actually used the images for business, that could weaken your position if questioned later.

From a record-keeping point of view, keep documentation for the required retention period in your jurisdiction. Even if you still use the headshots years later, you likely won’t need new tax treatment simply because the images are still in use. What matters is whether the original expenditure was for business purposes and properly recorded.

What if your business fails or you stop trading soon after the shoot?

Sometimes people commission professional photos in anticipation of launching a business or as part of a rebrand, and then the business doesn’t take off. The deductibility of the expense can depend on whether the cost was incurred in the course of starting or running the business, and how your local rules treat pre-trading or start-up costs.

If the photos were genuinely commissioned to support a real attempt to trade—like a launch plan, website build, client outreach—then there may still be a reasonable basis for the cost being business-related. But start-up timing rules vary, so this is one of those areas where getting specific local advice can pay off.

Examples of strong and weak justifications

Sometimes it helps to see how the same expense can look very different depending on context.

Stronger justification

You run a consultancy and are rebuilding your website, refreshing your proposals, and updating your LinkedIn profile to attract higher-value clients. You book a photographer for corporate headshots and brand photos of you delivering your service. The invoice states “commercial headshots and brand photography for marketing.” You upload the images to your website, proposals, speaker one-sheet, and LinkedIn. You keep the invoice and screenshots of usage.

Weaker justification

You book a lifestyle portrait session mainly for personal reasons, including several outfits and locations. You later use one image as a profile picture on a personal social media account and also on LinkedIn. The invoice says “portrait session” with no commercial usage described, and you don’t use the images on any business materials. You claim the entire cost as a business expense anyway.

How much can you claim?

In a simple case where the photos are wholly for business, you generally claim the full cost of the photography service that you paid. If there is mixed use, you may need to claim only the business portion. If the costs are substantial or bundled with non-business components, the cleanest approach is to ask the supplier to split the invoice into distinct business and personal items or to book separate sessions.

Also remember that “how much you save” depends on your tax situation. Deducting an expense reduces taxable profit; it does not typically give you a pound-for-pound refund unless you’re dealing with specific credits or reimbursements. The point is to claim legitimate costs so you’re taxed on real profit rather than overstated profit.

Should you claim headshot expenses if you’re worried about scrutiny?

Many people feel uncertain because headshots involve their personal image. The reality is that headshots are a normal, widely used business expense in many industries. If you use them to promote your business and you can evidence that use, claiming them is often reasonable. The bigger issues usually arise when people stretch the definition of “business-related” to include personal grooming, personal clothing, and personal lifestyle photography.

If you are risk-averse, focus on claiming the parts that are most clearly business: the photographer’s fee, licensing, and editing for commercial usage. Keep documentation. Avoid claiming borderline personal items unless you have a clear basis and local guidance.

Final takeaway

In many common situations, yes—professional photos or headshots that are commissioned and used for business marketing, branding, or operational purposes can be claimed as a business expense. The strength of your claim comes down to purpose, usage, and documentation. Keep invoices that describe commercial intent, keep evidence of where the images are used, and be cautious with add-ons that look like personal living costs. When there is genuine mixed use, separate or allocate the costs sensibly so your accounts reflect reality.

If you treat the expense like a business decision first and a tax question second—by documenting why you needed the photos and how you used them—you’ll usually end up with a claim that is both practical and defensible.